Translate

Saturday, December 13, 2014

Even though we are at end of the Fall semester, the world still goes on!

As the Fall academic semester is coming to an end and as finals are being sweated over, I often remind students that political events don't follow an academic calendar not even a weekly calendar of a five-day work work-week. In fact as 2014 is coming to an end we are certainly at a period of increased uncertainty, as the US Congress is about to have a drastic make-over, Europe is bracing for another Greek political crisis, Russia is reliving the 1980s as a collapsing oil market and rising dollar is testing the mettle of the state. The ethno-religious confrontations of western Asia are matched by the tensions centered around China, Japan and India in the Indian-Pacific region. Meanwhile upcoming elections in Africa and South America will test political stability and continue to test legitimacy gap between the citizenry and the government in many of those societies. Persistent inequality, poverty and hunger, climate change, terrorism, immigration, pandemics and political violence continue to strain government institutions as contagion of failed states is spreading beyond the global south using the same paths of globalization.
The 2015 checkpoint of the Millennium Developmental Goals is fast approaching and from all indications none of the eight goals would have been met, even though progress has been made across the board none of the goals have been met. Nonetheless the realization that gender, education, health, hunger and interconnectedness are essential to global development and consequently less violence is essential. It is essential thus to constantly be engaged beyond the limitations of the calendar as we should become global citizens with all the responsibilities and rights that identification entails. The first step in being engaged is to understand the language of the world affairs and to break down the noise, which inhibits global citizenship and promotes defection. Reading and being informed is the only way to gain the comfort and the confidence necessary to participate.
Mark Bittman's opinion article in The New York Times, "Is it Bad Enough Yet?" encapsulates many of the points and the climate of unease, tension, and pressure that many in the peripheries of state and global economic structure are feeling, a sense of asphyxiation.

Wednesday, June 25, 2014

"We Can End Poverty" Through Creative Math?



As we are approaching the first target date for The United Nations Millennium Developmental Goals of 2015, the United Nations has utilized some creative means to meet the first goal relating to global poverty. The criteria of the first goal, which is the eradication of poverty and extreme hunger,  have been redefined so as to meet the goal in time.
"Target 1.A:  
Halve, between 1990 and 2015, the proportion of people whose income is less than $1.25 a day"

In a number of recent articles, the United Nations and other organizations have undertaken a process so as to refime the threshold for who is considered poor based on horrifically low levels of consumption. For instance in a recent article in the Guardian newspaper of London, Ravi S Jha, questions in Redefining Poverty, the wisdom of reducing the threshold of poverty to $1.25 per person, since the number of poor is increasing and the inequality is getting greater, especially in India and China.